|
|
|
|
| Welcome, Guest | Home | Search | Login | Register | |
| Author | No luck with QEMU on Arm64 (Read 19665 times) | ||||||||||
|
galgot
64 MB ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 66 |
Reply #15 on: June 04, 2022, 12:49
Agree BasiliskII is an old thing, and there is a lot of tinkering by a lot of peoples... But I find that it is relatively well followed on emaculation.com, at least the main KanjiTalk755 fork. I usually find good support there. What did not work for you ? |
||||||||||
Last Edit: June 04, 2022, 13:01 by galgot
|
68040
|
512 MB ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 950 68k - thy kingdom come, thy will be done !
Reply #16 on: June 04, 2022, 22:30
|
I got one specific beef with it: The SIGSEV Ignore option only works on Intel and PPC systems, but I run on Arm64 Debian. Thus far no one there has been able to give me a technical reason why that restriction exists, but it bothers me just as that missing MMU annoys me. The later I could live with but the former can crash my system when I least need it. Also, QEMU offers snapshots, life disk compression and true SCSI emulation - which many disk tools insist on.
|
68040
|
512 MB ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 950 68k - thy kingdom come, thy will be done !
Reply #17 on: June 10, 2022, 23:18
|
Update: I tested various Windows and Linux versions on qemu-x86 on my Arm64 (Qualcomm QuadCore) host and anything beyond Win98SE or DSL (ancient Debian Woody) forces the system to a crawl - if it runs at all. Maybe PPC emulations are a lot faster, but I don't see how. That makes me focus on m68k again, as it doesn't make sense to me to build up a Mac system that's too slow to actually work on. But that shouldn't hold anyone back running Qemu on a more favourable system than mine.
|
|
Pages: 1 [2]
|
| |||
|
© 2021 System7Today.com. |

