Welcome, Guest | Home | Search | Login | Register
Author Dan's List of the Best (and Worst) Macs (Read 83609 times)
dpaanlka
1024 MB
******
Posts: 1646
View Profile http://www.danpalka.net
on: July 14, 2006, 05:22

All-Around Best Buy:

Macintosh Quadra 630 / LC 630 / Performa 630
Power Macintosh 6500
Power Macintosh 8600

PowerBook:

PowerBook 1400c/166
PowerBook 3400c/240
PowerBook 540c

All-in-One:

Power Macintosh 5500
Macintosh LC 580
Macintosh Color Classic II
Macintosh Classic II
Macintosh SE/30

Speed Demon:

Power Macintosh 9600
Macintosh Quadra 840av

Low Profile:

Power Macintosh 6100/66av
Macintosh Performa 6360
Macintosh Quadra 605 / Performa 475

Coolness Factor:

PowerBook Duo 2300c + Duo Dock II
Macintosh Color Classic II
TAM (Twentieth Anniversary Macintosh)
Workgroup Server 9150 (PowerPC Mac in Quadra 900 Case)
Mac TV

What to Avoid:
The original Color Classic.
Any 5200 (the 75mhz version is definitely the worst Macintosh ever made).
Any 5300 (both the desktop and the PowerBook).
Any 6200.
Any 6300 except the 6360.
Any 7200 except the 7220.
The original Mac LC.
The original Mac LC's successor, the LC II.
Any PowerBook 190.
Come to think of it, any PowerBook 100 series.
The PowerBook 520.
The 117mhz PowerBook 1400 (unless you plan to put a G3 in).
Last Edit: January 08, 2021, 07:45 by Bolkonskij
BobWoodshed
16 MB
***
Posts: 19

View Profile http://www.bobwoodshed.org
Reply #1 on: October 25, 2006, 03:06

Most Resistant to Beer Spillage

LC III (at least from what I've tested)
cballero
1024 MB
******
Posts: 1176
System 7, today and forever
View Profile
Reply #2 on: June 02, 2007, 04:36

Macs and beers, now that's quite a combination (as long as you don't mix them) now that's what I call funny! :)


BTW, good list Dan........I also liked the 6400, a close cousin to the 6500 (I had both).
Old Mac Geezer
64 MB
****
Posts: 112
View Profile
Reply #3 on: August 13, 2007, 12:23

You excluded the 7220 from the list of Macs to avoid??
Old Mac Geezer
64 MB
****
Posts: 112
View Profile
Reply #4 on: August 13, 2007, 12:33

Oh, I also don't see how the LC580 gets on the all in one list but the 575 doesn't. The monitor used in the 580 is junk compared to the one in the 575.
wall
256 MB
*****
Posts: 343
View Profile http://www.theslomolight.com
Reply #5 on: August 13, 2007, 15:40

Oooo, this is just a list and as such could help first time buyers plenty. But I do have a 7200 and with the Sonnet 400Mhz g3 it is quite mighty, cheap to buy and fun to use.


wall a.k.a The Defender Of The Holy 7200
wove
1024 MB
******
Posts: 1363

View Profile
Reply #6 on: August 14, 2007, 00:07

Quote from: "wall"
wall a.k.a The Defender Of The Holy 7200


I have always been partial to the PowerBook 190 and its big bothers the PowerBook 5300 series. The Color Classic, which makes the list to avoid is a highly prized collectors items.

I would encourage you to continue defending the "Holy 7200". :)

bill
dpaanlka
1024 MB
******
Posts: 1646
View Profile http://www.danpalka.net
Reply #7 on: August 14, 2007, 01:46

Quote from: "Old Mac Geezer"
You excluded the 7220 from the list of Macs to avoid??


It has a much better processor.

Quote from: "Old Mac Geezer"
Oh, I also don't see how the LC580 gets on the all in one list but the 575 doesn't. The monitor used in the 580 is junk compared to the one in the 575.


The LC 580 generally comes better specced in terms of memory and hard drive capacity, but the big secret about the LC 580 is that it can accept a video input card (similar to the Quadra/LC 630) - including the cable TV tuner!  The LC 575 lacks this ability (it has neither the necessary slot nor port cut-outs).  I have both, and the screens aren't that dissimilar either.  At least not drastically so, like the difference between the 5300c and 190cs screens.  I haven't turned either of them on in ages, but I don't ever recall noticing the screen on the 580 being bad.  The 580 also has an extra memory slot and has a higher capacity.

Essentially, its a MacTV with '040 power and a large memory capacity.

The LC 575 isn't a bad machine, but the LC 580 is just cooler, so if someone was in the market for one of those, I would go for the 580.

I can take pictures of my 580 if nobody believes me.  I don't know why the A/V features of the 580 are not documented on the major web sites like EveryMac.

Quote from: "wove"
I have always been partial to the PowerBook 190 and its big bothers the PowerBook 5300 series.


The 190 and 5300 have a notoriously bad power adapter design that was specific to that family.  They always fail eventually.  If you have one that hasn't failed, well then it wasn't used very much throughout its life.  My 190 actually caught fire, and other problems include intermittent or no power, sudden shutting off, etc... not to mention, the 5300 is so slow due to having no L2 cache and the 190 has a terrible screen.

Quote
The Color Classic, which makes the list to avoid is a highly prized collectors items.


The Color Classic has a lot of design limitations that make it way less desirable than the Color Classic II, which is on the "recommended" list and generally commands a higher price.

Hope that explains a little bit on why I chose what I chose.
madmann
256 MB
*****
Posts: 284

View Profile
Reply #8 on: October 29, 2007, 03:13

ok what about the 7600 is it any good?
Given that 8600 and 9600 are hard to find and in a tower case and i like the desktop models the 7600 may be the ticket
Devon
8 MB
**
Posts: 12
View Profile
Reply #9 on: March 07, 2008, 22:29

I have a performa 578 basically a 575 and i will say i prefer the 14 inch trinitron style screen over the lc580s cheaper shadowmask desplay, also the 578 uses scsi drives which are more expesnive then the 580s IDE drives, i also put 36meg ram in my 578 with a 700 meg scsi drive and a full 68040 at 33mhz along with the max 1 meg vram so it runs quite nicely! i would prefer it over the old 5200/75LC i used to own.
Minimalist
128 MB
****
Posts: 186
View Profile
Reply #10 on: March 08, 2008, 04:43

Quote from: "Devon"
I have a performa 578 basically a 575 and i will say i prefer the 14 inch trinitron style screen over the lc580s cheaper shadowmask desplay, also the 578 uses scsi drives which are more expesnive then the 580s IDE drives, i also put 36meg ram in my 578 with a 700 meg scsi drive and a full 68040 at 33mhz along with the max 1 meg vram so it runs quite nicely! i would prefer it over the old 5200/75LC i used to own.


I had an LC 575 for the longest time.   It's the only Mac that I ever bought new.   I thought it was the cat's meow when I bought it.

A friend of mine bought a Performa 580.   He paid about $1000 less for his machine than I paid for mine.   His came with a bunch of software that mine didn't come with and an external Glbal Village modem.   He also got a 500 megabyte hard drive versus the 160 megabyte hard drive that I got, an extra SIMM slot, and a bunch of expansion slots for things like a TV tuner, etcetera.

His monitor, however, which was like a fishbowl, was just awful.   The screen reflected the glare of any light source in the room regardless of orientation.   The only way to avoid the glare was to either place your lamp behind the machine or have no light in the room on at all.   The image displayed on his screen was nowhere near as crisp as on my LC 575's Trinitron display either.

I trashed my LC 575 last year.   My former friend sold his Performa 580 to some unsuspecting computer illiterate while it was still worth some money.   I don't know if he ever bought another Mac after he got rid of the old Performa 580.   I think he used the money to buy a canoe.
reyne
4 MB
**
Posts: 4
View Profile http://www.anydayaboveground.co.nz
Reply #11 on: July 26, 2009, 06:49

Good lists, I would have to agree with the 6200 listing - what a mix of mongrel parts and ideas that was, let alone the construction...

*fingers cut*

9600 looked like a beast in it's day, I could use a couple more PCI slots in my Beige G3 sometimes...

Now, if I could only run system 7 on my Dual 1.42 MDD...
ovalking
128 MB
****
Posts: 199
View Profile
Reply #12 on: July 27, 2009, 13:49

My faves are

Plus
SE30
LC475/P475
Q800
PM8500
PBD280c
B&W G3

I dislike a lot of the early power macs as too slow and unstable.
Don't like anything too big e.g. 6100, 8600.
Some of the pre i-mac all in ones were too ugly!
dougy
1 MB
*
Posts: 1
View Profile
Reply #13 on: April 10, 2011, 04:05

Some of the old macs that I still use on a fairly frequent basis:

Powerbook 170
Quadra 800
Quadra 950
and
a trashy Powerbook 5300
oldmacs
2 MB
*
Posts: 3
View Profile
Reply #14 on: July 08, 2012, 09:32

My all time favorite desktop is the LC 475 and laptop is the 1400cs
Pages: [1] 2

© 2021 System7Today.com.
The Apple Logo, Macintosh™, Mac OS™, and others property of Apple Computer, Inc.
This site is in no way affiliated with Apple Computer, Inc.